Excerpt, pages 86 - 91, used with kind permission from
Currency Press and Peta Tait from
Converging Realities
Feminism In Australian Theatre
by Peta Tait
(with contributions from Venetia Gillot, Julie Holledge, Anna Messariti,
Lydia Miller, Mary Moore)
Published by Currency Press, Sydney in conjunction with Artmoves, Melbourne
1994
In contrast, writer‑director‑producer Jenny
Kemp uses a completely different approach to foreground the spectator's subjective
responses when she sets out to externalise interior landscapes of thought
and feeling to be observed, entered and absorbed. Her theatrical collages
of visual imagery and soundscapes communicate an impression of sensory realms
which flow around each other, inviting the inner responses of the spectators.
She sets up a space for the spectators to wander around in with their minds,
to roam in, amble through, fantasise about, get lost in, to daydream in. This
experimentation with ways to enact inner realities arose out of autobiographical
performances in the mid‑1970s and from her increasing awareness that
theatre needs to offer a sanctuary for the spectator's inner world, inclusive
of both its nightmarish and its harmonious dimensions. Kemp explains:
I can't find plays to satisfy me. I need to build my own. I form a
theatrical world where we can experience everyday dream, myth and fantasy coexisting
where linear time restraints are left behind. I just know I've got to build a
different world ... theatre reinforces the values of the mundane world through
its form and content ‑ it remakes the social world we live in. I find
this problematic.
Kemp criticises a theatre which merely duplicates the outward
naturalistic appearances of social reality as unsatisfying and indicative of an
impoverished vision.
Influenced by both Freud and Jung, Kemp synthesises
their theories into descriptions of dream states, memories and fantasies. If
her work infers a search for a feminine unconscious, a similar purpose to that
of the Žcriture feminine described in the work of Cixous and Irigaray, this is
because Kemp wants to redress the social repression of inner experience
beginning from her own gendered perspective. The White Hotel (1983), adapted from the novel by D.M. Thomas, was about the inner
disturbance of Lisa Erdman, an opera singer under treatment with Freud in
Vienna. The nightmarish fantasies of Erdman's inner perceptions were conveyed
in performance as contradictory to the rational logic of the external reality
surrounding her. Yet she intuitively predicted her own death to reveal the
personal truth of these inner experiences. One reviewer explained how the
production:
digs below the rational surface of the human mind into the subconscious,
relating the fears and repressions of childhood to the adult personality ...
As adaptor, director and organiser of this disturbing and wide‑ranging
play, jenny Kemp has performed the labours of Hercules.
Another reviewer confirmed: 'The point of view is that a patient diagnosed
by Freud as an hysteric, and therefore crazy, in the reality of the twentieth
century, is quite sane'. Through the expressive style of her theatre work,
Kemp confirms how this inner world conditions and directs social behaviour
yet is suppressed by it.
In
Good Night Sweet Dreams (1986) Kemp developed a
text around her own dreams based on a record she and her partner kept over a
year. She interchanged dreams, reality, waking and sleeping states in the lives
of Leena and Limon, using puppets to become the elephants, deformed babies and
cricketers of the dream‑state on the stage. These dreams were seen by
critic Peter Weiniger as a ... 'natural extension of our lives, constantly
interacting with reality rather than in conflict ... humorous and whimsical ...
scenes of domestic life'. The impact of dreams on individual behaviours and
social interaction was clearly evident in Kemp's theatrical depictions of this
interchange between the unconscious and day‑to‑day reality. Her
theatrical exposŽ of intensely private moments challenges the separations
between inner and outer worlds. For women who have traditionally been confined
to private social spaces the metaphoric private space of the mind is both a
refuge and a potential field of repression which must be expiated. Kemp's theatre
echoes a state of intimacy which can only ever be subjectively experienced. In
this way she reveals how the separate and different experiences of individual
inner worlds confirm totally different realities occurring simultaneously. One
reviewer commented: 'She is enchanted by the idea that upon waking we might
come from somewhere completely different, say, in the middle of the ocean, and
now we are calmly sitting and having breakfast'."
In Call of the Wild (1989) Kemp produced a female subjectivity which circulated between an inner
world and the external, visually defined boundaries of animate and inanimate
forms. The woman subject was emblematic and mercurial, at times bare‑breasted,
dressed in a large garden party hat and gloves in multiple images of herself
and at other times isolated in her tower (suburban room) doing housework. In
her visual references to Paul Delvaux paintings, Kemp juxtaposed the men and
women against incongruous, anachronistic buildings and backgrounds and each
other to convey disjointed time frames. Elizabeth Drake helped establish a
soundscape which gave the audience a sense of listening in on a private
conversation. The spoken text was partly obscured as a male persona read aloud
from a book in French and Spanish. The depiction of an unchanging natural
feminine self is interpolated by brutal intrusions from the legacy of cultural
archetypes such as a Cinderella fantasy where one of the ugly sisters cuts off
her heel to fit into the slipper. The meaning is fragmentary and fluid in Call
of the Wild, showing the female self outside
fixed definitions in an expression of contradictory possibilities.
Kemp
explains:
I
feel the ambiguity is really important because it allows for possibilities
rather than things narrowed down ‑ complexity ‑ possibility of
change ‑ and complex passion ... I spend a lot of time with actors looking
for ambiguous delivery.
A circulating female subjectivity formed the substance
of the text, moving around the sexually objectified female body
aligned with nature and the socially constructed symbolic woman created through
spoken language and artistic images, to communicate an interactive state of
being which takes in elements of both and throws up endless interchangeable
combinations.
Kemp wants the audience to find themselves in the conjunction of
their inner and outer worlds. But the world of female subjectivity is unsafe,
continuously exposed to intrusions and invasions from a hostile external world;
constantly under threat of sudden violence. Remember (1992)
concerns a woman's rape moving between memories of what preceded the event, the
rape, the victims present time in the hospital room, the waking fantasies
arising out of the experience and its impact on her dream-state. In the
oscillating time sequences of the text the potential for the rape to have been
prevented coexists with the consequential aftermath, formed as much from the
resulting psychological terror as it was from the body's physical trauma. The
circumstances surrounding the rape are repeated and relived as the performance
manifests the woman's thoughts, constantly sifting through her feelings of
shock and disbelief. The murder of her assailant becomes both part of the event
and a projected fantasy of revenge in the performance.
Kemp's theatre would seem to be responding to the regret expressed by Artaud in his question:
How does it happen that in the theater ... everything that cannot be expressed in speech, in words, or, if you prefer, everything that is not contained in the dialogue is left in the background?
She brings the unspoken to the foreground and overlaps thoughts and reflections in a strongly imagistic theatre text which speculatively mirrors the creative process itself, Her intention for the audience to come closer to understanding
their own inner states through this theatre also echoes Artaud's
call for a metaphysics of speech and gesture:
theater must pursue by all its means a reassertion not
only of all aspects of the objective and descriptive external world, but of the
internal world, that is, of man [author's insertion: of woman] considered
metaphysically'. The absence of narrative and of predictable dramatic
structures gives the audience time to mentally drift in and out of the work.
Kemp explains how she is inviting her audience to 'play' and daydream within
the viewing of the performance. The merging of time sequences replicates an
inner world where past and future are always experienced through the present
and memory is continually reappraised and compounded.